Crisis & Mass Notification | Armstrong Resilience

EARLY WARNING - SITUATION AWARENESS - FLEXIBLE RESPONSE - SHARP COMMUNICATIONS - PRIORITIES - SOLUTION MAPS

Crisis & Mass Notification

Assurance platforms with scalable capacity for business and Crisis leaders

armus2 exists to close the gaps behind operational resilience, business continuity management, and third party risk management (TPRM) - a single connected compliance tool answering the question - can we take the hit and keep running? - where most organisations struggle with confidence.

Regulators demand timely response, proven abilities and consumer protection Increasingly focused attention is landing on how effective an organisation is in responding to the unexpected. Regulators expect disruption and therefore fast preparation to be in place. Proven Operational Resilience that identifies critical and important business services, manages prioritisation and changes to adapt to maturing disruption scenarios. They want t o see clear governance and accountability, managing third party and supplier risk finding root causes to ensure lessons are closed out. Warning signs that become major regulatory concerns are missing critical services, unsophisticated testing, weak governance and unresolved remediation actions indicating consumer exposure.

TRUSTED BY RESPONSE TEAMS IN GLOBAL FINANCE, ONLINE, HEALTH, MANUFACTURING, UTILITIES, AVIONICS

0hr

Rapid Response & Crisis Plans with Instant Change Adaptability

2013+

Operating Resilience compliance capability and experience

21+

Already
Deployed in Regulatory Compliant Global
Juridictions

100%

On Board Integrated Mass Notification & Currency System

PPP+

Automated Crisis Assurance Tools delivering People,
Processes and Priorities

WHAT BUSINESS AND CRISIS LEADERS FACE TODAY

Crisis Management is more demand led

Crisis Leaders are challenged in a fast moving, high impact environment, How to access interconnected data that answers the uncertainties of limited information. How to rapidly change and develop their response to fast impactful scenarios that can compound incomplete decision making, waiting or making assumptions. Boards and regulators demand proof that this capability is not just covered but acceptable and used.

Slow Decision Making. Crises escalate fast, organizations often lose critical hours waiting for information, consensus, sign-off, or the "right" person to be reached. In BP's Deepwater Horizon early decision-making were criticized for downplaying the spill's scale, delaying the response. Equifax: Waited six weeks after discovering the breach before disclosing it publicly compounding reputational and regulatory damage

Poor Communications. Mixed messages, conflicting statements from different spokespeople, or silence itself, erode trust fast. Volkswagen "Dieselgate": Initially minimised the emissions cheating before it became undeniable. More damaging than the original violation. Boeing 737 MAX: Defended the aircraft's safety as evidence mounted, which regulators and the public later viewed as a credibility failure.

Cascading & Second Order Effects. Plans built around scenarios fail when the crisis triggers have unrelated consequential problems — supply chain, staffing, legal, reputational — simultaneously. Fukushima Daiichi: The plan accounted for earthquakes and tsunamis separately but not adequately for the combined failure of backup systems that resulted.

Third Party & Supply Blind Spots. This is rising fastest on the priority list for leadership specifically because its the one they're least able to control directly, yet still fully accountable for (Solar Winds, CrowdStrike, Microsoft), Boards are increasingly asking "what's our version of this" before regulators ask it for them.

Learning from Near Misses & Incidents. This is the one that turns a single bad day into a pattern regulators and auditors treat as systemic negligence - "you knew, and didn't fix it" is a far worse position that "we didn't see it coming" The common thread across all five: they're less about the crisis itself and more about inter connected governance, accountability, and evidence

Armus2 : The Flexible Response

Armus2 is a single adaptive platform that unifies Operational Resilience, Risk Management, Continuity, TPRM, Crisis and Incident Management — so the picture that used to live across multiple teams with several tools now lives in one place instead.

We understand the problem because we've built the response frameworks ourselves. Armus2 is integration turning assurance from something a leader assets into something they can demonstrate. We've done this as Practitioners who've rapidly responded, know what information is needed, designed instantly changing playbooks that adapt to shifting scenarios and information, and have run the situation room when an impact threatens consumers critical services. It's not theory — it's built into how the platform works.

1. One current picture, not five conflicting ones. When continuity, risk, third-party and cyber data all sit in the same system, a leader sees one version of what's happening — not a risk register that says one thing, a continuity plan that says another, and a vendor spreadsheet nobody's updated since last year. The assurance this gives: when a crisis leader complies his team and response the speed and quality of decision making change, and your consumers notice it.

2. Decisions based on what's Actually True right now. Because data is live not static, a disruption shows real dependencies, real recovery times, real resourcing — not what someone documented six months ago. The assurance: decisions get made faster because leaders aren't waiting for someone to go check if the plan still reflects reality. You already have the response.

3. Clear ownership, End to End. Integration forces every risks, plans, suppliers and actions to have named owners that are visible across disciplines, not just within a team's silo. The assurance: when a crisis leader or executive asks "who is responsible," there's an answer already sitting in the system — not a scramble to construct a response after the fact.

4. Vendor and supply chain risk stops being a blind spot.
As third-party data feeds the same model as continuity and risk, a critical supplier's failure shows up immediately as an operational, cyber or recovery risk, not as a separate conversation days later. The assurance: leaders can say "we know our third-party response" and actually have the strategy and resource to deal with it, rather than hoping nothing like Microsoft or CrowdStrike happens to them.

5. Evidence is already there when it's needed.
Every action, test, and decision leaves a trail automatically, rather than being reconstructed under pressure for an auditor or regulator. The assurance: leaders aren't relying on memory or goodwill during a review — the proof that the organization did what it said it would do already exists.

We Speak Crisis Management, So You Don't Have To

Our experience, knowledge and understanding is all part of the Armus2 culture. From manufacturing, digital, finance, healthcare, government and commercial we have taken the time to understand global to local governance and regulation, industry standards and best practice to ensure Armus2 reflects your organisation, If it is ISO 22301:2018 · ISO 22361:2022 · ISO 27001 · NFPA 1600 · FCA/PRA · NIS2 · ISO 2700 · BCI or DRII we have it covered. Instead of treating each regulation and good practice as a separate project, Armus2 maps your response, adaptability, dependancies and consumer protection data all at once — and drivers a single set of resources to satisfies multiple and changing scenarios, all at the same time. When a crisis management asks for "data and evidence" its all at his fingertips, for quick accurate decision making with confidence, no searching.

Your
Resilience

Your Business. Your Resilience. Your Way